Home > Generalities > Other questions > Do I need an acoustic IR?

Do I need an acoustic IR?

Saturday 19 February 2022

Here I demo different solutions to amplify your guitar (analog 1-4 and digital 5-7).

Part 1: Use an external microphone.

PROs: The sound is natural, the feel is great thanks to a natural response.

CONs: Feedback prone. You can not move around the stage. Needs EQ to help "cut through the mix".


Part 2: Use a piezo pickup (Here an undersaddle transducer).

PROs: Plug & play. It’s very feedback resistant. You can move around the stage.

CONs: The sound is not natural, (it "quacks"). When you hit the strings it can provide a "plasticy response" .Needs EQ to tame the quack and reverb to get a sens of space.


Plugged in sound part 3 & 4: Dual source UST Pickup + internal microphone

With 50% internal mic blend:

With 100% internal mic blend:

PROs: Plug & play. Great amplified tone.You can move around the stage. The sound becomes more natural as you blend in some internal microphone signal. However it keeps the qualities of a pickup to cut through a mix. The response is natural and direct. It’s all analog.

CONs: It will feedback if pushed.


Plugged in sound part 5, 6 and 7: UST Pickup + Custom made IR presets

The "Quackless" IR preset:
It’s meant for people who are satisfied with their pickup overall tone but just want to remove the "quack".

PROs: Direct, "in your face", piezo tone that cuts through a mix... But quackless. Plug & play. You can move around the stage. The response is more natural and very direct for an IR. Feedback resistant.

CONs: It will does not sound like your guitar exactly acoustically. You need an IR pedal.

The "Dry" IR preset:
It’s meant for people who wants their acoustic tone without the "room" presence of microphone recording and without the phasey/boxy resonances you can find in some IR files.

PROs: Direct, accurate acoustic tone. Plug & play. You can move around the stage. The response is more natural and very direct. Feedback resistant. No room resonance, no phasey/boxy resonances, direct feel response (for an IR).

CONs: The response will not be as fast as an analog solution. You need a digital pedal with IR and advanced EQ like a ine 6 HX/Helix.

The "Mic-like" IR preset:
It’s meant to reproduce as accurately as possible the external microphone recording.

PROs: Accurate recorded microphone tone. Plug & play. You can move around the stage. The response is very natural.

CONs: The response is distant, as if someone was playing few meters in front of you. Not the most feedback resistant of IR. You hear the room resonances of the intial recording it is made from. You can sometimes feel a phasey/boxy fx kind like a fixed wah. You need an IR pedal.

If you like this website, please donate to support it.